tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3255698616447805540.post7448628055445355909..comments2022-10-02T18:16:24.735-07:00Comments on Nickolay: dyld: unknown required load command 0x80000022 starting Firefox (and others) on Mac OS X 10.5Nickolay Ponomarevhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09119458759380558928noreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3255698616447805540.post-74319660397564568212012-06-13T07:51:21.444-07:002012-06-13T07:51:21.444-07:00Awesome, thanks! --Simon Smith, ArcodeAwesome, thanks! --Simon Smith, ArcodeAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3255698616447805540.post-31740147334539789852012-03-18T17:33:05.854-07:002012-03-18T17:33:05.854-07:00Awesome--thanks for this solution.Awesome--thanks for this solution.Ben S.https://www.blogger.com/profile/18318654451373143132noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3255698616447805540.post-32101683907191186422011-10-23T10:11:21.875-07:002011-10-23T10:11:21.875-07:00If you receive this error, the application was inc...If you receive this error, the application was incorrectly built on OS X 10.6 machine for a 10.5 machine. The developer can fix this by considering three things:<br /><br />1. Using the correct compiler parameters:<br /> gcc-4.2 -mmacosx-version-min=10.5 -isysroot /Developer/SDKs/MacOSX10.5.sdk ...<br /><br />2. Using the correct linker settings (setting environment variable before link command). This is required, so that the OS X 10.6 linker will not use the loader command 'LC_DYLD_INFO_ONLY' (=0x80000022), because OS X 10.5 does not understand this command:<br /><br /> export MACOSX_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET=10.5<br /> (or setenv MACOSX_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET=10.5)<br /><br />After this is fixed, one can check if the application was correctly built for OS X 10.5 by running 'otool':<br /><br />otool -l binary<br /><br />The correct binary should not contain any 'LC_DYLD_INFO_ONLY' load commands (only 'LC_DYLD_INFO' commands).<br /><br />(also see my blog article http://grauonline.de/wordpress/?p=71 )greymfm76https://www.blogger.com/profile/17903112905275499882noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3255698616447805540.post-22182026967391161832011-04-07T09:31:10.021-07:002011-04-07T09:31:10.021-07:00Oddly, I only had this problem when attempting to ...Oddly, I only had this problem when attempting to load Firefox with a command-line argument (such as loading a different profile or the profile manager. When loading firefox with no command-line arguments, it loaded fine.<br /><br />Many thanks for taking the time to post this information!Luke Goodsellhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10127104900190601684noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3255698616447805540.post-19249713140922269272011-04-02T16:46:25.930-07:002011-04-02T16:46:25.930-07:00Try this on OSX 10.5:
ditto --arch i386 firefox-bi...Try this on OSX 10.5:<br />ditto --arch i386 firefox-bin.original firefox-bin<br /><br />It was suggested here:<br />https://github.com/jnicklas/capybara/issues/313/#comment_950014JWhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06879692482811814312noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3255698616447805540.post-86247021629864804392011-01-23T10:20:55.551-08:002011-01-23T10:20:55.551-08:00Thank you very much for this helpful post!Thank you very much for this helpful post!BLFDAThttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07285627245349152681noreply@blogger.com